Showing posts with label New Users. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Users. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2013

Gamification @ Stack Exchange

Now, that we know about Stack Exchange and Area 51, lets skip to the main part. The Gamification Site Proposal finally went into the commitment phase. It has been moving along slowly, but if speed is any indicator, then slow is better than fast.

The topic of the proposal is gamification. Gamification is a buzzword which means the use of game elements in non-game engagement contexts. The term, however inaccurate and incomplete, will stick, as most of the work being done, and there is a lot being done, on the field already references and uses the name. Gamification has spread like wildfire over the past few years and will continue on an upward trend till 2016 after which things are expected to slow down. There are a huge number of designers who develop gamified applications and a significant number of people who are treading into it for the first time. The gamification course on Coursera has had a total of 19000 individuals complete it with greater than 70% marks. Add to that the number of professionals already working on gamified systems, and you get a significant number of internet using gamifiers.

What is missing from here, is a single collaborative knowledge sharing resource where developers may collaborate with researchers and work on their problems. A place where professionals may interact and discuss the principals of the field. What is missing is one Q&A site that deals with all of the issues of these diverse user groups. Herein comes gamification.stackexchange.com.

The creator of the proposal is himself a professional of the field, Ryan Elkins. This shows that there is a space to be filled. Also, the 10k Courserians that complete the course everywhere have nowhere to go and discuss once the course gets over (the course forums are cleared every session). Gamification.SE can be a home to many of them as well.

All in all, the user-base is real and vast, and there is no major competition nearby. Excellent conditions for the site to come out strong.

Coming to the scope, the site would cover the psychology that is involved in gamification, along with design and user experience. All of these is technically on-topic on other sites, but at less than 4-5 questions on gamification per month, it is safe to say, that none of the sites would have a problem.

So, what are you waiting for? Register your support!

Stack Exchange Q&A site proposal: Gamification

Friday, March 8, 2013

A Short Guide to the Essentials of Stack


Background

This guide is intended for users absolutely new to the system and covers the basic UI elements.
For more in-depth guidance and advice, search Meta Stack Overflow for relevant posts.




There are five basic elements of the Stack Exchange user interface that you will be using the most, and understanding how these affect you, and how you affect others' through these, will make your experience much more worthwhile. I will be using this question (of mine) as a reference to explain the basic features. The five basic elements are :

Posts

Posts here refers to both questions and answers. Both follow different formats.

Questions

You can ask questions by clocking on the Ask Question button available on the home page. Questions have two parts.
The first part is the question title. It is a short description of the problem such that a person reading it should be able to generally understand what your problem is about.
    This is the title.

The second part is the question body. The should contain the complete question along with everything else needed for the problem to be answerable and ideally, even details asked for in the comments should be added to the question body.

The answer with a grey tick sign
The same answer marked as correct

Answers

You can answer a question by clicking on the Answer Question button at the bottom of the page of a question. Answers just contain a body.


The body should contain all the relevant details needed for the problem to be solved. If referencing any external sources, make sure that you add the relevant part of the reference to the body itself and then cite the source below it. Link only answers are not considered answers and will be deleted.

As shown in the image, one answer can be marked as the correct answer by the question poser. The correct answer is the one answer that was able to solve your problem. In no other scenario, should an answer be marked correct, even if other users may pester you to do so (which happens quite frequently). An answer can be marked as correct only after a certain amount of time has passed since the question was posted. A grey tick sign appears adjacent to every answer, clicking on which sets that answer as the correct answer. The grey tick sign then changes to a solid color, such as green as can be
seen in the image.


    Upvote

    Upvotes can be cast by clicking on the up arrow button next to a post. An upvote is a sort of acknowledgement that the post is good. The message shown on hovering over the button also says the same thing. 

    There are certain things that you should consider while casting upvotes for a question :
    • Is the question clear and understandable ?
    • Does the question have the relevant schematics and/or code within the body ?
    • Did the person try to solve the problems on his own ? If yes, has the person shown his attempts at tackling the problem ?
    • Is it something that cannot be easily Googled and found ? (This last one is my personal metric and is used by quite a few users within the Network, but its not a standard rule as pointed out by  the FAQs across the network)
    There are certain things that should be considered for casting an upvote for an answer as well :
    • Is the answer clear and understandable ?
    • Is the answer self-contained ? Does it contain the relevant information from any external sources with it ?
    • Does the answer solve the problem ? If not, does it at least, attempt to solve the problem and provide something extra as well ?
    If one of your posts was upvoted, it means that you were able to satisfy some or all of the aforementioned criteria or that someone found your post useful irrespective of these factors. Either way, you did a good job! 

    Lastly, upvotes are anonymous.


    Downvote

    Similar to upvotes, downvotes can be cast by clicking on the down arrow. A downvote is a negative feedback for the creator of the post. It is used to tell the creator that the post has serious problems. Downvotes should not be used lightly.

    There are certain specific factors that you should consider before casting a downvote on a question :
    • Is the question unclear or hard to understand ?
    • Is the problem easily solvable via searching through Google ?
    • Is the question lacking in some way ? Is the question incomplete ? Is the question missing schematics / code relevant to the problem ?
    • Has the person not attempted to solve the problem on his own ? Has the person posted his attempts at solving the problem ?
    Some things to keep in mind before going trigger happy. If the post has only grammatical or spelling problems, then you should first attempt to make corrections and try to make the post understandable. Salvaging a post should be the first action, followed by downvoting.

    There are certain factors that should be looked at before casting a downvote for an answer as well :
    • Is the answer unclear and not understandable ?
    • Is the answer referencing an external source and not providing a solution within the body ?
    • Does the answer not even attempt to answer the question ? If not, does the answer not even provide something useful to the problem ?
    • Is the answer a veiled advertisement of a product without any disclosure ?

    This feature is not available until you are able to gain some experience on the site. However, your posts can be downvoted by other users. If that happens, you should evaluate your post on the basis of these guidelines and see whats missing.

    While casting downvotes, I would advise exercising caution. Downvotes should not be cast without due considerations and after an attempt to salvage posts.

    Downvotes are also anonymous.

    Comments

    Comments are like meta-posts. They are short messages that can be used to communicate with the different individuals who were a part of both creation and editing. To communicate with any user, you simply need to prefix @ to the username, and then write the rest of your message. The user gets a notification about the message instantly. However, in a comment you can only notify one user.

    Comments under the question body. Only for the serious stuff.

    Comments serve different purposes  depending on where they are. Comments should be used only to seek clarifications from the author, ask for extra details, or to make suggestions to improve the post. Before clicking on the downvote button, it is always better to first inform the user about what is lacking in the post and what changes need to be made. If the user does not respond only then should you downvote the post. Sometimes, they can be used to suggest solutions to the problem, however, that is not recommended, even though many users indulge in this habit.

    Notifications

    Notifications are alerts that you get when a post of yours gets a answer or a comment, when an edit is made or suggested, and when someone makes a comment with @your-user-name. Initially, you also get notifications about any badges that you earn on the site.


    The small StackExchange button on the left serves as the main notifications panel. Clicking on it shows you all the recent notifications, as well some of the most interesting questions from around the network.
    Towards the left, there is a panel that displays your user name, along your reputation score, number of badges. On hovering over it, you get an expanded panel, showing you all your recent reputations changes.


    With that we come to the end of this brief tour of the Essentials. I have chosen to not go into the reputation system and badges system at this point as it is not an important part of the system. It is an integral part, but not an important one. Lastly, some of the features described here become available only after crossing certain reputation requirements. These are site specific and can be found in the respective FAQs. As and when a feature of the site becomes available. you get a notification about the same.




    If you keep the points described here in mind, then reputation and badges are the last things that you will have to worry about.

    Wednesday, March 6, 2013

    What is Area 51 ?

    I stumbled across Area 51 while wandering through the Stack Exchange network. 
    Look at the spaceship

    The FAQ states:
    Area 51 is the Stack Exchange Network staging zone. It's where groups of experts come together to build new Q&A sites that work just like Stack Overflow. Here you can:
    • Propose new Q&A sites. If you have an idea for an expert Q&A site, propose it here.
    • Get involved in the process. Help sites get off the ground by defining the types of questions that are wanted, recruiting a critical mass of experts, and committing to the site's success.

    This is where users can propose new site ideas which are called New Site Proposals in SE lingo. These sites need to go through three phases before they get launched as official sites under the Stack Exchange network. The phases are :

    • Definition Phase : This is first phase and the phase where most proposals get weeded out. In this phase, users are expected to :
    • Click the "Follow It!" link, if interested in a proposed site.
    • Post questions that you would want to see on the actual site, when launched.
    • Upvote questions if you think they'll be interesting and are relevant to the proposal, downvote questions if you think they are not. 
    • Comment on questions already proposed to seek clarifications about the question and discuss it.


    • Commitment Phase : In this phase, the defined site requires individuals to commit to using it. Users can commit to the site by filling in their name and level of experience in the proposal domain. A commitment can be easily fulfilled, its just 3-4 questions and answers.


    • Beta Phase : If a proposal reaches here, then the supporters have done an excellent job so far (will explain later). This phase is extremely critical for the future of the site. It has two very different phases within it.
      • Private Beta : Users who committed to using the site are initially invited to participate in and simultaneously test the site and its features. This also acts as the seeding phase of the site before it opens up to the World Wide Web. The users have an extremely critical task at hand as whatever content is created now decides, at the very least, the site's direction for the short term future.
      • Public Beta : Now, the site opens! It is fully functional and requires a lot of publicizing and content to truly take it towards success. Once the site satisfies certain criteria and reaches the tipping point, the site gets launched as a Stack Exchange Network site.


    This was a summarized description of the site creation process. It should be enough to get you started on the platform.


    Certain parts have been copied AS IS from the Area 51 site FAQ. These parts have been indented and are in a different font to be easily identifiable.